<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Days of Thunder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/</link>
	<description>The Penultimate Toronto Raptors Fan Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:12:22 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Friday Bolts &#8211; 10.23.09 &#124; Daily Thunder.com</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42770</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Bolts &#8211; 10.23.09 &#124; Daily Thunder.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42770</guid>
		<description>[...] I did a quick Q&amp;A about the Thunder for Raptors Republic yesterday. Read up. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I did a quick Q&amp;A about the Thunder for Raptors Republic yesterday. Read up. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brothersteve</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42749</link>
		<dc:creator>brothersteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42749</guid>
		<description>Have to say no.  Not jealous.

Wouldn&#039;t mind one of their potential stars in a Raptors uniform though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to say no.  Not jealous.</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t mind one of their potential stars in a Raptors uniform though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddahfan</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42735</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddahfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42735</guid>
		<description>Greatest weakness as a team

Youth and inexperience. The team has talent. Nobody is questioning that, but with a starting five that averages just 24 years of age and a bench that is even younger, you can’t be sure what kind of progress they’ll make. Learning to win close games is going to be key if this team is going to do any kind of damage this year.

=============
Greatest weakness

1.  Horrible interior defense
2.  Mediocre defensive rebounding
3.  Very weak bench
4.  Don&#039;t know how to win

At this point the Thunder can be a lot of fun to watch especially when they have it going on offense.  KD is one of the best scorers and shooters in the league.

However, whether this core unit will ever be able to consistently win is still totally unkown and will depend on seeing is believing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greatest weakness as a team</p>
<p>Youth and inexperience. The team has talent. Nobody is questioning that, but with a starting five that averages just 24 years of age and a bench that is even younger, you can’t be sure what kind of progress they’ll make. Learning to win close games is going to be key if this team is going to do any kind of damage this year.</p>
<p>=============<br />
Greatest weakness</p>
<p>1.  Horrible interior defense<br />
2.  Mediocre defensive rebounding<br />
3.  Very weak bench<br />
4.  Don&#8217;t know how to win</p>
<p>At this point the Thunder can be a lot of fun to watch especially when they have it going on offense.  KD is one of the best scorers and shooters in the league.</p>
<p>However, whether this core unit will ever be able to consistently win is still totally unkown and will depend on seeing is believing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42732</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42732</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry - you are right Macy.  Its been a great 15 years.  Lots of success - we were just like those Chicago Bulls teams during that 15 year period you referenced.  I guess the regression was easier for them to take after winning 6 titles in between time.  And the Raptors did push Philly to 7 games in the second round in 2001 - so I see where the comparison is warranted.  So I take it all back.

(Though, by cellar dweller, I did mean we finished one game from the bottom of the Atlantic division last season.  Though by rebuild, I did mean like Oklahoma - not like the Toronto Maple Leafs).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry &#8211; you are right Macy.  Its been a great 15 years.  Lots of success &#8211; we were just like those Chicago Bulls teams during that 15 year period you referenced.  I guess the regression was easier for them to take after winning 6 titles in between time.  And the Raptors did push Philly to 7 games in the second round in 2001 &#8211; so I see where the comparison is warranted.  So I take it all back.</p>
<p>(Though, by cellar dweller, I did mean we finished one game from the bottom of the Atlantic division last season.  Though by rebuild, I did mean like Oklahoma &#8211; not like the Toronto Maple Leafs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hardcore Raps</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42724</link>
		<dc:creator>Hardcore Raps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42724</guid>
		<description>Love the mis-quotes, errors and assumptions.  Always leads to an reasonable argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the mis-quotes, errors and assumptions.  Always leads to an reasonable argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paps</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42721</link>
		<dc:creator>Paps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42721</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t take it anymore, please start the season now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t take it anymore, please start the season now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macy O'Baston</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42717</link>
		<dc:creator>Macy O'Baston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42717</guid>
		<description>1983-84 Chicago Bulls won 27 games...15 years later, the Bulls won 17 games! My god, they regressed 10 games in 15 years! Where will they be in the future???

I assume the GM you&#039;re talking about in your oh-so-coy way is Bryan Colangelo, the 2-time GM of the year. I&#039;m not sure what &#039;cellar dweller&#039; you&#039;re talking about, the Raps I&#039;ve watched for 3 years made the playoffs in 2 of them and, after a failed experiment in year 3, intelligently gave himself flexibility to overhaul his team in the summer. 

Is this not a rebuild? Keeping your 3 best players from the last 3 seasons and getting rid of those that didn&#039;t work? In your world, after a 5 game loss in the &#039;08 playoffs you would&#039;ve shipped out Bosh (then a 3-time all-star), Bargnani (in his 2nd year after being a #1 overall pick) and everyone else for not meeting your expectations. Then rebuilding after that sweet #17 pick that yielded the franchise player Roy Hibbert! 

Why would anyone try to win NOW (when you have the talent to do it) when you can take a chance on the uncertain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1983-84 Chicago Bulls won 27 games&#8230;15 years later, the Bulls won 17 games! My god, they regressed 10 games in 15 years! Where will they be in the future???</p>
<p>I assume the GM you&#8217;re talking about in your oh-so-coy way is Bryan Colangelo, the 2-time GM of the year. I&#8217;m not sure what &#8216;cellar dweller&#8217; you&#8217;re talking about, the Raps I&#8217;ve watched for 3 years made the playoffs in 2 of them and, after a failed experiment in year 3, intelligently gave himself flexibility to overhaul his team in the summer. </p>
<p>Is this not a rebuild? Keeping your 3 best players from the last 3 seasons and getting rid of those that didn&#8217;t work? In your world, after a 5 game loss in the &#8216;08 playoffs you would&#8217;ve shipped out Bosh (then a 3-time all-star), Bargnani (in his 2nd year after being a #1 overall pick) and everyone else for not meeting your expectations. Then rebuilding after that sweet #17 pick that yielded the franchise player Roy Hibbert! </p>
<p>Why would anyone try to win NOW (when you have the talent to do it) when you can take a chance on the uncertain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macy O'Baston</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42710</link>
		<dc:creator>Macy O'Baston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42710</guid>
		<description>I understand what you&#039;re saying, but it&#039;s still totally based on hindsight. Roy is far better now than he was projected to be, so you&#039;re using flawed logic. Nobody had these kind of expectations for him.

And why do you need an NBA ready player when Chris Bosh is your best player? He was 23 at the time, they weren&#039;t in a &#039;win now&#039; mode (and are barely even there now).

Imagine if Roy was the decent, non-All Star that he was projected to be. Imagine that Bargs was Dirk. It hasn&#039;t happened that way, but 90% of people would&#039;ve predicted that scenario over what we currently see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand what you&#8217;re saying, but it&#8217;s still totally based on hindsight. Roy is far better now than he was projected to be, so you&#8217;re using flawed logic. Nobody had these kind of expectations for him.</p>
<p>And why do you need an NBA ready player when Chris Bosh is your best player? He was 23 at the time, they weren&#8217;t in a &#8216;win now&#8217; mode (and are barely even there now).</p>
<p>Imagine if Roy was the decent, non-All Star that he was projected to be. Imagine that Bargs was Dirk. It hasn&#8217;t happened that way, but 90% of people would&#8217;ve predicted that scenario over what we currently see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42708</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42708</guid>
		<description>Oklahoma had a dreadful start to last season posting a W-L record of 4-30 by New Year&#039;s. From then on, the Thunder played .400 basketball (19-29).

If Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook can take the next step in their careers (plus the addition of James Harden) then the Thunder can be a threat to play .500 ball next season. 

-----------------------------------------

I fully agree, the Thunder badly need a very good-to-elite rebounder/defender in the post. I don&#039;t think they can get away with playing Jeff Green at the power forward slot long term without that type of center in the lineup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oklahoma had a dreadful start to last season posting a W-L record of 4-30 by New Year&#8217;s. From then on, the Thunder played .400 basketball (19-29).</p>
<p>If Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook can take the next step in their careers (plus the addition of James Harden) then the Thunder can be a threat to play .500 ball next season. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>I fully agree, the Thunder badly need a very good-to-elite rebounder/defender in the post. I don&#8217;t think they can get away with playing Jeff Green at the power forward slot long term without that type of center in the lineup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42707</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42707</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not their cap situation in 2010 that is the issue ... it&#039;s their cap situation in 2012 after they sign Durant, Green and Westbrook to their contract extensions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not their cap situation in 2010 that is the issue &#8230; it&#8217;s their cap situation in 2012 after they sign Durant, Green and Westbrook to their contract extensions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42705</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42705</guid>
		<description>How long? That&#039;s a good question, David.  

I&#039;ve been a Raptor fan for 15 years.  We won 1 playoff series in that time - I think we beat Allan Houston and the Knicks.  I think we won 30 games our second year as a franchise, back in 1996, with Damon Stoudamire.  We won 31 last season - our 15th in the league.  In 2025, I&#039;m hoping we aren&#039;t coming off a 32 win campaign, waxing all nostalgic about an Atlantic Division title we won back in &#039;07.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How long? That&#8217;s a good question, David.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a Raptor fan for 15 years.  We won 1 playoff series in that time &#8211; I think we beat Allan Houston and the Knicks.  I think we won 30 games our second year as a franchise, back in 1996, with Damon Stoudamire.  We won 31 last season &#8211; our 15th in the league.  In 2025, I&#8217;m hoping we aren&#8217;t coming off a 32 win campaign, waxing all nostalgic about an Atlantic Division title we won back in &#8216;07.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42702</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42702</guid>
		<description>Oh yes, the road to the &quot;eventual&quot; championship.

How long till we get there again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, the road to the &#8220;eventual&#8221; championship.</p>
<p>How long till we get there again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42696</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42696</guid>
		<description>Why undergo a slow rebuild and put your team on the road to an eventual championship when you can simply hire Jerry Colangelo&#039;s son as a GM and maybe make the playoffs two years out of every four? Who wants a long-term rebuild when we can simply throw the big dollars after Hedo and Jack and maybe make the first round of the playoffs today? Not me.  I like knowing our good years are the ones in which we push &quot;Class A&quot; opponents to six games in the first round - thank you very much.  No long term rebuild for this cat.

Besides, how would it look if people always judged you because your dad gave you your only job as a GM, and then the first time you step out on your own, you end up turning someone else&#039;s team into a cellar dweller? Not because you didn&#039;t spend to the luxury tax, mind you, or because you wanted to undergo a youth movement and build through the draft - but because the best team you&#039;d ever assembled won only 31 games.  How would it look if you had to admit that you needed to start over and grit your teeth through a couple more 30 win seasons like the Thunder?  It might spoil your special Italian suit, let me tell you.  People might stop talking about how dapper you and your clothes are...and they might start talking about something more substantive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why undergo a slow rebuild and put your team on the road to an eventual championship when you can simply hire Jerry Colangelo&#8217;s son as a GM and maybe make the playoffs two years out of every four? Who wants a long-term rebuild when we can simply throw the big dollars after Hedo and Jack and maybe make the first round of the playoffs today? Not me.  I like knowing our good years are the ones in which we push &#8220;Class A&#8221; opponents to six games in the first round &#8211; thank you very much.  No long term rebuild for this cat.</p>
<p>Besides, how would it look if people always judged you because your dad gave you your only job as a GM, and then the first time you step out on your own, you end up turning someone else&#8217;s team into a cellar dweller? Not because you didn&#8217;t spend to the luxury tax, mind you, or because you wanted to undergo a youth movement and build through the draft &#8211; but because the best team you&#8217;d ever assembled won only 31 games.  How would it look if you had to admit that you needed to start over and grit your teeth through a couple more 30 win seasons like the Thunder?  It might spoil your special Italian suit, let me tell you.  People might stop talking about how dapper you and your clothes are&#8230;and they might start talking about something more substantive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Moro</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42695</link>
		<dc:creator>David Moro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42695</guid>
		<description>Problem being, the center is the most difficult piece to acquire. Why do you think Tyson Chandler still has a job, despite his numerous injuries?

There are plenty of nice, young, athletic wings and guards out there--problem is there aren&#039;t many centers. 

And the ones they could try to get on the back end of their careers are retiring soon.

Has Presti made good picks? Certainly. But unless he starts to spend (some money/trade one of his young horses) on a legitimate center, then they&#039;ve basically shat the bed on a five hundred team. Sure, they made money and got buts in the seats--but they won&#039;t win enough.

Portland is the same. If you keep stockpiling young talent, you don&#039;t give it enough space to grow. It&#039;s like a garden, where too many flowers choke each other off. At some point you have to use those assets to acquire what you need. Portland&#039;s record was nice and all, and statistically they were the top team offensively in the NBA--and they got beat by a team without it&#039;s two all-stars. Pathetic.

The thing is, these GM&#039;s are so married to their young talent and they never trade it away. How long does Outlaw have to stay a Blazer? How long does it take to trade someone valuable. You don&#039;t get to have your cake and eat it too. SOME risk taking is required.

The owners and GM&#039;s who keep trying this approach generally fail because

a) They run out of money to pay all the young talent
b) The young talent gets tired of waiting to be good
c) of course some of the players don&#039;t turn out well

There needs to be a mix for success, one that I don&#039;t think Pritchard and Presti want to pay for.

 One of the major issues this blogger touched on was the fact that the Western Conference is so tough to begin with. I guess the problem for most franchises in the West is that they see no way to be competitive (for something significant--like a championship) at all in the short term. This way, they can sell hope to the fan base without actually ever having to be good for quite some time, in addition to it being cheap so they can try to &quot;wait for their window&quot;.

Sometimes, the window needs to be forced open. As the wise swami says...we&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem being, the center is the most difficult piece to acquire. Why do you think Tyson Chandler still has a job, despite his numerous injuries?</p>
<p>There are plenty of nice, young, athletic wings and guards out there&#8211;problem is there aren&#8217;t many centers. </p>
<p>And the ones they could try to get on the back end of their careers are retiring soon.</p>
<p>Has Presti made good picks? Certainly. But unless he starts to spend (some money/trade one of his young horses) on a legitimate center, then they&#8217;ve basically shat the bed on a five hundred team. Sure, they made money and got buts in the seats&#8211;but they won&#8217;t win enough.</p>
<p>Portland is the same. If you keep stockpiling young talent, you don&#8217;t give it enough space to grow. It&#8217;s like a garden, where too many flowers choke each other off. At some point you have to use those assets to acquire what you need. Portland&#8217;s record was nice and all, and statistically they were the top team offensively in the NBA&#8211;and they got beat by a team without it&#8217;s two all-stars. Pathetic.</p>
<p>The thing is, these GM&#8217;s are so married to their young talent and they never trade it away. How long does Outlaw have to stay a Blazer? How long does it take to trade someone valuable. You don&#8217;t get to have your cake and eat it too. SOME risk taking is required.</p>
<p>The owners and GM&#8217;s who keep trying this approach generally fail because</p>
<p>a) They run out of money to pay all the young talent<br />
b) The young talent gets tired of waiting to be good<br />
c) of course some of the players don&#8217;t turn out well</p>
<p>There needs to be a mix for success, one that I don&#8217;t think Pritchard and Presti want to pay for.</p>
<p> One of the major issues this blogger touched on was the fact that the Western Conference is so tough to begin with. I guess the problem for most franchises in the West is that they see no way to be competitive (for something significant&#8211;like a championship) at all in the short term. This way, they can sell hope to the fan base without actually ever having to be good for quite some time, in addition to it being cheap so they can try to &#8220;wait for their window&#8221;.</p>
<p>Sometimes, the window needs to be forced open. As the wise swami says&#8230;we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42693</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42693</guid>
		<description>Exactly, which is the reason I am criticizing BC&#039;s decision in the 06 draft; he swung for a homerun when (he admitted this in an interview I saw) he could have taken the safe choice and choosen the most NBA ready player in Roy.  Plus, at the time, we were sorely lacking scoring production on the wings, and Roy would have been a much better compliment for Bosh.  Then we would have been a defensive center away from a very competitive team.  Now we find ourselves in the same position 3 years later.  You cannot argue with the fact that the last three years have been a wash for the Raptors, as they didn&#039;t imrpove the team at all before  this summer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, which is the reason I am criticizing BC&#8217;s decision in the 06 draft; he swung for a homerun when (he admitted this in an interview I saw) he could have taken the safe choice and choosen the most NBA ready player in Roy.  Plus, at the time, we were sorely lacking scoring production on the wings, and Roy would have been a much better compliment for Bosh.  Then we would have been a defensive center away from a very competitive team.  Now we find ourselves in the same position 3 years later.  You cannot argue with the fact that the last three years have been a wash for the Raptors, as they didn&#8217;t imrpove the team at all before  this summer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42687</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42687</guid>
		<description>Durant, Green and Westbrook have rather affordable team options next season.  Re-signing all three would only put them at about $35 mil in payroll.  I don&#039;t know who&#039;s available next off-season but assuming a $50-53 mil salary cap, they&#039;ll have at least $15 mil available.  If the salary cap is at least ~$52 mil, they&#039;ll have enough room to sign someone to a max contract, and then fill the remaining 3 roster spots with exceptions or minimum salary players.  That&#039;s a pretty good start, not too different from Portland a few years back with all the young talent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Durant, Green and Westbrook have rather affordable team options next season.  Re-signing all three would only put them at about $35 mil in payroll.  I don&#8217;t know who&#8217;s available next off-season but assuming a $50-53 mil salary cap, they&#8217;ll have at least $15 mil available.  If the salary cap is at least ~$52 mil, they&#8217;ll have enough room to sign someone to a max contract, and then fill the remaining 3 roster spots with exceptions or minimum salary players.  That&#8217;s a pretty good start, not too different from Portland a few years back with all the young talent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42686</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42686</guid>
		<description>Yup.  Not a single expert thought Roy would be the best player out of the draft.  He was most ready for the NBA, but the knock on him was that he&#039;d be a solid NBAer, nothing more, considering he didn&#039;t do anything exceptionally well.  So after all the potential #1s were picked, it was only natural to pick Roy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup.  Not a single expert thought Roy would be the best player out of the draft.  He was most ready for the NBA, but the knock on him was that he&#8217;d be a solid NBAer, nothing more, considering he didn&#8217;t do anything exceptionally well.  So after all the potential #1s were picked, it was only natural to pick Roy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42685</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42685</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if this is the reason why we didn&#039;t pick him, but I remember that very few people thought he was worth a 1st overall pick.  He had the talent and tools, but many questioned his motivation, or lack thereof.  He seemed to coast during college ball, which didn&#039;t bode well for his professional career I suppose.  The reason why we didn&#039;t pick him was probably more Colangelo&#039;s obsession with Bargnani than any fault of Gay&#039;s though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if this is the reason why we didn&#8217;t pick him, but I remember that very few people thought he was worth a 1st overall pick.  He had the talent and tools, but many questioned his motivation, or lack thereof.  He seemed to coast during college ball, which didn&#8217;t bode well for his professional career I suppose.  The reason why we didn&#8217;t pick him was probably more Colangelo&#8217;s obsession with Bargnani than any fault of Gay&#8217;s though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonious35</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42684</link>
		<dc:creator>tonious35</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42684</guid>
		<description>Thunder need a guaranteed rebounding gobbler and shot blocker who can stay on the team for 6 years straight (11-12 RPG, 2BPG) to become playoff contenders.  This team does not have enough prime beef in the front court to push them over the 0.500 hump.  I can say they are one solid, if not NBA All-Star post player away from playoff contention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thunder need a guaranteed rebounding gobbler and shot blocker who can stay on the team for 6 years straight (11-12 RPG, 2BPG) to become playoff contenders.  This team does not have enough prime beef in the front court to push them over the 0.500 hump.  I can say they are one solid, if not NBA All-Star post player away from playoff contention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MC B-Rad</title>
		<link>http://raptorsrepublic.com/2009/10/22/days-of-thunder/#comment-42682</link>
		<dc:creator>MC B-Rad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raptorsrepublic.com/?p=11659#comment-42682</guid>
		<description>no one said best player, they said most NBA ready...potential is what Bargs was sold on...most gms figured the long term potential of bargs far outweighed what roy would become</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no one said best player, they said most NBA ready&#8230;potential is what Bargs was sold on&#8230;most gms figured the long term potential of bargs far outweighed what roy would become</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
